1 min read

EU Sets Benchmarks for Clinical Evidence Assessment for Recertification of Medical Devices

EU Sets Benchmarks for Clinical Evidence Assessment for Recertification of Medical Devices

 

As a result of the new European Union Medical Device Regulations (MDR), existing products (most legacy devices) that already had received CE Mark under the previous Medical Devices Directive (MDD), will need to be re-certified.  In April 2020, the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) issued clinical evidence recommendations for those devices.

The MDCG suggests to adopt a hierarchical ranking of clinical evidence, which ranges from high-quality clinical investigations covering all device variants and indications (Rank 1) to preclinical and bench testing (Rank 12). Ranks 1 to 4 imply outcomes from high-quality clinical studies or registries are needed. Equivalence data (Rank 5) and evaluation of clinical data from similar devices (Rank 6) could be considered only as supportive. All other lower-ranked data sources (e.g. complaints and vigilance data, individual case reports, non-clinical safety data) are not generally regarded as high-quality data due to limitations in reporting. Class III legacy devices and implantable legacy devices that are not well-established technologies should have sufficient clinical data as a minimum Rank 4.

The proposal is not legally binding, but should nevertheless play an essential role in the regulatory decision making in practice.

Implications for Innovators

Due to the COVID-19 crisis, implementation of the EU’s MDR is postponed for one year and now will take effect on 26 May 2021. New deadlines are:

  • May 2022 – Expiration of EC certificates of conformity issued before May 27, 2017
  • May 2024 – Expiration of all EC certificates issued 5 years from the issue/renewal date or 4 years from the MDR date of application
  • May 2025 – End of marketability of devices certified under the MDD

The recently issued guideline of the MDCG provides the benchmarks for the expectations in clinical evidence to be met for re-certification. It is recommended that companies which have not yet started to begin the preparation of GSPR clinical evidence strategy for their Class II and III legacy medical devices or refine their process accordingly.

Veranex’s (formerly Boston Healthcare Associates) European office in Berlin, Germany, can support manufacturers and developers in the identification of evidence gaps and strategies for evidence development to meet the conformity assessment. Please contact us to learn more.

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Cybersecurity: 10 Misconceptions About Medical Device Software

Artificial Intelligence (AI), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Cybersecurity: 10 Misconceptions About Medical Device Software

Medical Device Software (MDSW) is a growing, fast-evolving industry. However, manufacturers must often face a regulatory framework which does...

Read More
Medical Device Vigilance: Important Considerations to Comply With the EU MDR

Medical Device Vigilance: Important Considerations to Comply With the EU MDR

Vigilance reporting and postmarket surveillance of medical devices are among the many requirements documented in the EU MDR (2017/745) to ensure the...

Read More
Critical Updates for Medical Device Manufacturers and Healthcare Institutions: Switzerland Aligns with EU IVDR Transitions

1 min read

Critical Updates for Medical Device Manufacturers and Healthcare Institutions: Switzerland Aligns with EU IVDR Transitions

Switzerland has officially implemented its adapted Ordinance on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (ODiV), effective January 1, 2025. This...

Read More