5 min read

The Ins and Outs of Using ECMO and VAD in Preclinical Studies

Heather Antonovich : Nov 1, 2024 4:00:13 PM

Cardiovascular Preclinical Product Development

The Ins and Outs of Using ECMO and VAD in Preclinical Studies

Ventricular assist device (VAD) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are two similar temporary techniques to bridge cardiac therapy or transplants. In rare cases, they can also be a more permanent therapy for patients who are ineligible for transplants. ECMO systems typically bypass the heart entirely, taking deoxygenated blood from the IVC/SVC, oxygenating it through membrane filters externally, and pumping the oxygenated blood directly back into the cardiovascular system. ECMO systems can be V/V (venous to venous) or V/A (venous to arterial).

VAD systems assist the body by taking the load off of a ventricle and circulating blood at appropriate flow rates. Respiratory assist devices provide support by removing C02 or oxygenating blood to assist the lungs. All of these techniques require cannulation and often long-term 24/7 patient monitoring.

Choosing a Surgical Approach

The device that you’re testing typically dictates the surgical approach. We take into consideration the size and length of cannulas and cables, the desired indwelling anatomical location, and the blood volume or flow required among other requirements. ECMO and LVAD may require any one or a combination of the following surgical approaches:

Thoracotomy (with or without graft)
Jugular or carotid access
Retroperitoneal access
Femoral vein or artery access

Why wouldn’t you use femoral access?

Although it’s very common in clinical applications, femoral veins/arteries are less common in preclinical ECMO or VAD models for several reasons.

The length of anatomy from the femoral vein/artery to the heart in large, four-legged animals is greater compared to humans and most devices would need to be custom-built for greater length (increased from 90–100 cm to 110 cm or greater)
Once the animal is recovered, keeping the cannula/catheter in place is challenging at best, or impossible
The angle of insertion may bend or break the cannula and often pinches the cannula at the access site

Species Selection: Unsuitable Models

Porcine Models

Although anatomically suitable for short-term acute or early feasibility studies, swine are not suitable for long-term ECMO or VAD studies. They’re difficult to restrain as tethering or normal restraints lead to rolling, scratching, or damage to the tubing/devices. Long-term restraints would require lifts/harnesses that restrict movement entirely or heavy sedation.

Canine Models

Canine anatomy is too small for the devices and, similarly to swine, they are difficult to restrain for long periods of time to prevent rolling/tangling in cables and external tubing.

Species Selection: Suitable Models

Ovine Models

Suffolk Crossbred sheep are approximately 50–80kg at the time of the initial procedure, which is a sufficient size and blood volume for most ECMO/VAD studies. They have a shorter body length, which can make the device placement easier relative to calves, but do not respond well to being separated from other sheep in isolation. Overall, they’re docile and tolerant of externally placed catheters/monitoring equipment but can be less accepting of tethering and are prone to being skittish while being handled if not acclimated properly.

Bovine Models

Beef/Dairy Cross calves are 70–90kg at the time of the initial procedure. Their larger vascular anatomy allows for convenient cannula placements and their larger blood pool allows for more blood sampling. Juvenile calves can have some initial illnesses or acclimation stress during transportation but are typically docile and tolerant of externally placed catheters and monitoring equipment.

Note on the Use of Animals

Veranex is dedicated to the advancement of animal and human health. The animals at our Atlanta and Paris facilities are cared for with the highest respect and gratitude for their sacrifice in helping to advance the medical field and improve outcomes for humans for years to come.

Implant Procedures

Our surgical team can perform the entire implant operation with assistance from sponsor engineers priming their ECMO/VAD circuit and controller. Our team is experienced in surgical placement via thoracotomy, jugular, carotid access, and retroperitoneal approaches.

Indwelling Venous Line

We place the indwelling venous line at the right or left jugular vein (typically a Hickman 9.6 Fr). We typically shorten the length and puncture additional holes near the tip to prevent suctioning to the wall during blood draws. This line is usually left in throughout the duration of a study and is used to administer the heparin CRI and drugs as well as obtain blood samples for ACT, blood gases, and blood tubes.

Animal Recovery

Before leaving surgery, the animal is placed sternal and needs to be breathing independent of a ventilator. They’re then transported to the vivarium with a circuit connected and pump running, typically on a mobile cart behind a lift table. The animal is carefully moved into the stanchion while being mindful of the tubing and cables. From there, the animal is placed in an individual pen that prevents the animal from being able to turn around and is designed to keep the tubing from becoming tangled. The animal is monitored by veterinarian staff 24/7 for the duration of the study, which requires constant ACT checks and heparin drip titration. Our team vigilantly checks and records the animal’s vital signs and behavior. We also perform SOAP exams, TPR, blood gases, and collect blood tube samples regularly.

Anticoagulation

Most ECMO/VAD devices require some form of anticoagulation. Using Heparin CRI (100,00 U / 1L bag saline) carefully titrated over time to bring ACT within a predetermined range has been our most successful method. We’ve also attempted other anticoagulation such as Clopidogrel/Aspirin and warfarin with minimal success. ACTs are checked every four hours when within range and every one to two hours when outside or trending outside of range to minimize sampling.

Anticoagulation Measurement

Abbott I-Stat

Cartridge-based system requires <1 ml per sample
Our preferred method for ICU-style studies

Hemochron Response

Spinning tube-based system that requires ~3ml of blood per sample
In our experience, I-Stat generally records slightly lower ACT values comparatively, but has much more consistent value
Makes tracking ranges simpler between animals
Not specifically tied to individual animal baselines
The hemochron system records slightly higher values, but can vary in value range more dramatically from sample to sample

Target Range

1) This is defined in the GLP protocol. There are two common methods: 1) Set the range to 1.5x to 2.0x baseline ACT value for each animal
- Specifically set for each animal
- Highly dependent on initial baseline reading
- Makes tracking ranges between multiple animals more challenging
2) Set range (e.g. 200 seconds to 350 seconds)
Monitored by manual hematocrits, clinical pathology, and plasma-free hemoglobin
Reducing or halting heparin CRI can often reverse some anemia, but increases the risk or clotting

Blood donation from a naive animal, if allowed, in protocol and an emergency condition can be helpful

Challenges of the ICU Model

Projects of this scope are some of the most challenging undertakings a preclinical laboratory can assume. 24-hour ICU care run at a GLP-compliant lab can be a costly and extensive use of staff and resources. Example: 12-animal, 21-day study.

Requires 42, 12-hour shifts with 4 staff members per shift
Totals a minimum of 2,016 skilled labor hours while maintaining GLP compliance and ensuring the welfare of the animals
Remember to add in time for a study director, veterinarian, quality assurance, etc.

Potential Clinically Adverse Effects

1. Anemia - due to prolonged circuit therapy, numerous blood samples or anticoagulation

2. Hemorrhaging/Hematomas – at vascular access sites

More common in jugular or carotid access sites with anticoagulation running compared to retroperitoneal or thoractomy
Treatable in most cases with pressure bandages or manual draining

3. Infections

More common in retroperitoneal or thoractomy access sites
Despite best efforts, these surgical accesses are not 100% sealed to bacterial ingress along the tubing/drive lines
Access sites are cleaned daily
Temperature and SOAP exams are typical first signs
Antibiotics are typically given for ~3 days post-operatively
Antibiotics could be given continuously, but calves and sheep with prolonged antibiotics can have digestive issues and the study should not mask potential GLP safety issues by blanketing antibiotics without clinical indicators

4. Clotting – in the tubing, oxygenator, pump, or other parts of the circuit

Although certain parts may be replaceable, some are not or would be considered failed endpoints by the GLP protocol
Some fibrinous growth in tubing and oxygenator is often expected and typical as long as it does not hinder or occlude flow and does not break off as it would be later found in downstream organs

5. Thrombus – resulting in stroke, cardiac arrest, or pulmonary embolism - Very few treatment options, typically resulting in an early mortality or early termination

6. Acute Interstitial Pulmonary Emphysema – also known as interstitial pneumonia (AIP)

Common cause of sudden respiratory distress in cattle
Sudden onset of clinical signs with minimal coughing and severe difficulty breathing similar to an asthma attack
Affected animals often die despite supportive treatment
Bubble-like appearance of lungs is an indication at necropsy

Are you pursuing an ECMO/VAD device? Veranex' team of industry leading preclinical professionals have deep experience in cardiovascular preclinical studies, GLP and non-GLP. Collectively the team has supported over 100 regulatory submissions returned with no questions asked.