2 min read
Five Questions to Ask When Evaluating a Preclinical CRO
Medical device innovators need trustworthy CROs for preclinical studies to help speed the process from concept to commercialization. Below are a...
Traditional CROs fragment device development with costly hand-offs and learning curves. Veranex unites the essential disciplines for medical device & diagnostic development under one roof from sketch to evidence-generation to market launch.
All connected. All aligned. All accelerating your path to market—delivering breakthrough devices and diagnostics that improve patient lives sooner.
Breakthrough innovation requires more than great solutions; it demands deep expertise and insight. Veranex packages outcome-driven solutions with 25+ years of specialized knowledge across major medtech categories, delivering integrated capabilities that solve your most pressing challenges faster and with greater certainty.
Purpose-built solutions. Proven results. User & Patient-centered innovation.
Whether you're transforming patient care or disrupting entire therapeutic categories, innovation requires more than great science, it demands velocity. Veranex was founded to bridge the gap between visionary concepts and market reality, combining proven expertise with agile execution to accelerate the innovations that matter most.
We are the Innovation CRO.
Legacy of excellence. Proven execution. Patient impact accelerated.
3 min read
Heidi Jerman : Nov 29, 2023 4:16:41 PM
Why search the scientific and medical literature?
“Scientific and medical literature is a significant source of information for monitoring of the safety profile and of risk benefit balance of the medicinal products, particularly in relation to detection of new safety signals or emerging safety issue.”1
Screening the literature is important to ensure that a new medicinal product demonstrates a positive benefit-to-risk ratio — that the expected benefit of treatment outweighs the known and reasonably anticipated risks — during pre-clinical and clinical studies as well as once it has received marketing authorization and is being used by the greater public. In other words, the benefit-risk evaluation (BRE) needs to remain positive. Review of the relevant literature helps provide the information needed to conduct the BRE for the product, which takes the form of expedited reporting, periodic reports, and signal detection activities. These are submitted to regulatory authorities in various countries to support the ongoing marketing authorization.
What type of information is required?
The section providing the literature data in various regulatory documents, such as Development Safety Update Reports (DSURs) and Periodic Benefit Risk Evaluation Reports (PBRERs) is important. These documents must include any new and significant safety findings during the reporting period, such as:1
Which sources should be used for the literature review?
To identify new signals and locate information to include in the period reports, literature sources include the European Medicines Agency (EMA) medical literature monitoring (MLM) service, global (indexed) literature, and local (non-indexed) literature.
The MAH has a responsibility to incorporate the EMA MLM information into their safety databases and periodic reports, maintaining compliance with the marketing authorization requirements within and outside of the EEA. The MAH also has a responsibility to report ICSRs that have not already been reported to EudraVigilance and the MLM service.2 This includes suspected ADRs for active substances covered or not covered by the EMA service.
Searches are structured to be as broad as possible to minimize any chance of missing a relevant publication. Two of the many ways to create a search string are:
In addition to published abstracts and articles in medical/scientific journals, monitoring should also include unpublished information such as case reports, important safety findings, or descriptions of findings from clinical studies (e.g., posters, letters to the editor, and scientific meetings).
Why are quality and efficiency important for monitoring the literature?
The quality of literature monitoring in the pharmacovigilance process is critical to evaluating a potential causal relationship between the ADR and the product and can have a significant impact on the quality of ICSRs, periodic safety reports, detection of new safety signals, and eventually the BRE of medicinal products.
An efficient process is needed to overcome the time, cost, and relevancy needs related to searching the growing volume of information. Manual search strategies can be time consuming and costly and may miss relevant information if the search is too narrowly defined. The sources as well as the techniques to extract pertinent information are consequential.
We hope you have found this article useful in understanding the basics of a scientific literature review to support pharmacovigilance. Veranex is an experienced partner for pharmacovigilance services, and we are here to help. Learn more about our Data Management & Analytics services and how they can support your clinical development or get in touch today to start the conversation about your pharmacovigilance or clinical data services needs.
References:
2 min read
Medical device innovators need trustworthy CROs for preclinical studies to help speed the process from concept to commercialization. Below are a...
Software is gaining relevancy in a broad range of medical devices, as it either enables the control or influence of their operation, or because...
Medical Device Software (MDSW) is a growing, fast-evolving industry. However, manufacturers must often face a regulatory framework which does...